"Retest Our Last Option, Panel Must Probe Paper Leak": Supreme Court On NEET

4 months ago 10

The Supreme Court on Monday advised caution to a clutch of petitioners demanding a re-test of the May 5 NEET-UG exam, the results of which were released last month and have been affected by leaked question papers and the award of 'grace marks', or preferential marking, for 1,563 students.

The court said certain circumstances - specifically "(if) the time lag between the leak and actual exam is limited" - would argue against a re-test. "If students were asked to memorise (the leaked questions) on the morning of the exam then the leak might not have been so widespread..."

The three-judge bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud said it therefore was loathe to order a re-test for nearly 24 lakh students - many of whom come from poor families and could ill-afford to spend money travelling to exam centres - unless necessary. A re-test is the "last option", it said.

"One thing is clear... questions were leaked. The sanctity of the exam has been compromised... this is beyond doubt. Now we have to establish the extent of the leak," the Chief Justice said, "We have to be careful while ordering a re-test. We are dealing with the careers of lakhs of students."

"You don't cancel an exam only because two students cheated. We must be careful..."

The Supreme Court said a re-test could only be ordered if there was sufficient time (the court did not specify how much this should be) between the leak of the questions and conduct of the exam.

"If time lag was too long then there needs to be a re-test... or, if we can't identify candidates who are guilty of wrongdoing, then a retest has to be ordered," the Supreme Court said.

On the subject of the time lag, the court also sought details about the printing of the question papers. And, in a humorous aside, also reminded the NTA to not reveal details about the process.

Therefore, instead of ordering an immediate re-test the court advised the constitution of a multi-disciplinary panel to probe this issue, which is already being investigated by the CBI and the police.

The court also rapped the government for being in "denial" and said it should be "ruthless" in dealing with candidates who paid for the leaked exam and those who supplied the question paper.

"Let us not be in self-denial about what happened..." the bench, also including Justice JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, said, adding, "Assuming we do not cancel, what will the government do to identify the beneficiaries? You have to be ruthless... bring some sense of confidence to the process."

Earlier the court had been told question papers were available on social media, including popular messaging apps like Telegram, at least 24 hours before the exam was to begin. It acknowledged this point and said that if questions had been so leaked, it could have "spread like wildfire".

Controversy over the NEET-UG exam broke last month after results were declared.

The first red flags were the unusually high number of perfect scores; a record 67 students, including six from one coaching centre, scored a maximum 720. Questions were also asked over the award of 'grace marks' - not exam protocol, the NTA said - to 1,563 students.

The NEET exam - held annually for admission to undergraduate medical courses - were conducted on May 5. Controversy over the exam - which nearly 24 lakh students took - broke last month after results were announced. The first red flags were the unusually high number of perfect scores; a record 67 students, including six from one coaching centre, scored a maximum 720. Questions were also asked over the award of 'grace marks' - not exam protocol, the NTA said - to 1,563 students.

Article From: www.ndtv.com
Read Entire Article



Note:

We invite you to explore our website, engage with our content, and become part of our community. Thank you for trusting us as your go-to destination for news that matters.

Certain articles, images, or other media on this website may be sourced from external contributors, agencies, or organizations. In such cases, we make every effort to provide proper attribution, acknowledging the original source of the content.

If you believe that your copyrighted work has been used on our site in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please contact us promptly. We are committed to addressing and rectifying any such instances

To remove this article:
Removal Request