HC to BBMP: Check bylaw violations before ordering demolition

11 months ago 14

BENGALURU: Instead of directing for demolition of a structure only on account of building plan sanction not obtained, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (

BBMP

) has to consider if there is any violation of building bylaws and pass necessary orders thereafter.
Justice

Suraj Govindaraj

has made this observation while disposing of a batch of petitions filed by owners of sites formed in

Remco

(BHEL) Layout, Bengaluru.

The site owners had challenged the notices issued by BBMP, claiming that a compound wall and a shed was constructed in the property to secure the same from encroachers and trespassers. They contended

Mirle Vardaraj

and his relative Manjunath colluded with land owners and BBMP officers to usurp their lands and even khata was not restored despite submission of supporting documents.
After perusing the provisions of the Karnataka

Municipal Corporations

Act and the BBMP Act, Justice Suraj Govindaraj said merely stating that the construction is illegal without detailing the illegality in sufficient detail would not be in compliance with the requirements of 321(1) of the Municipal Corporations Act-1976 which was applicable to Bengaluru or that under the present section 248 (1)of the BBMP Act-2020.

"Whenever authorities were to pass confirmatory orders for demolition under relevant laws, it would be required to consider any violation of the building bylaws. If there is no violation, the BBMP may issue necessary building/sanction plans to enable regularisation of the building, directing to make payment of property tax along with due penalty from the date on which the construction was made without obtaining the plan sanction," the judge added.

Chief commissioner to probe
On the allegation of collusion between officials and private parties, the court said the chief commissioner will have to initiate an inquiry.
"Though

Mirle Varadaraj

and Manjunath and others may or may not have a valid claim over the property, the officers (BBMP) cannot act contrary to the law at the behest of the private party. They would have to comply with the principles enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution and treat everyone equally. They cannot be treated as a pawn or a stooge of private parties and act on their behalf. BBMP has been established to serve the interests of the citizens and not a few powerful persons. The officials are required to act in accordance with law, failing which the law will have to take steps to bring them in conformity with law," the judge observed.

Article From: timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Read Entire Article



Note:

We invite you to explore our website, engage with our content, and become part of our community. Thank you for trusting us as your go-to destination for news that matters.

Certain articles, images, or other media on this website may be sourced from external contributors, agencies, or organizations. In such cases, we make every effort to provide proper attribution, acknowledging the original source of the content.

If you believe that your copyrighted work has been used on our site in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please contact us promptly. We are committed to addressing and rectifying any such instances

To remove this article:
Removal Request